opennav

EisnerAmper Cayman | Facilitating trade, understanding markets. Cayman

EisnerAmper Global

News & updates

12.2.2020

EisnerAmper Cayman Affiliate EA Governance Offers Governance Services

The Cayman Islands recently enacted legislative changes (which EisnerAmper previously reported on) to enhance the oversight of smaller open-ended mutual funds (previously exempted due to having less than 15 investors) as well as closed-ended funds (private equity funds) to boost best practices and strengthen investor confidence. EisnerAmper Cayman affiliate EisnerAmper Governance Services Ltd. (EA Governance) can be instrumental in providing governance services that clients might require for an offshore entity allowing clients to focus on investment management.

Given the conflict of interest between governance and audit, solely non-attest clients would be able to take advantage of EA Governance, which is regulated under the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority.

Some of EA Governance offerings include:

  • Providing clients with Independent Board Directors, Managing Members, Independent Fund Representatives, and Members for Investment Advisory, Limited Partnership Advisory and Conflict Advisory Committees. 
  • Company management consisting of registered office services, board secretarial services, along with general advisory and consulting services; and also providing adequate office space for a client’s Cayman entity, along with qualified full-time employees and professional directors to manage the Cayman entity.
  • International tax compliance services such as helping clients determine the best way to meet their requirements of tax regimes and make the required filings under FATCA/CRS.
  • Cayman Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Compliance, providing dedicated professionals to help clients meet their compliance needs and regulatory requirements.  

Latest News
12.2.2020

Cayman Islands Law Requires Registration

On February 7, the Cayman Islands Government passed sweeping legislation to enhance oversight of investment funds to boost best practices and strengthen investor confidence.  The Private Funds Law, 2020 requires private funds formed in Cayman to register with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) within the next six months. The Mutual Funds Law, 2020 removed the small fund exemption (those with fewer than 15 investors) thereby subjecting substantially all private open ended and closed ended funds formed in Cayman to register with CIMA.  (For more insight, please see EisnerAmper’s previous report on the Cayman Islands’ enactment of legislative changes to enhance oversight of investment funds to boost best practices and strengthen investor confidence.)

Under the new laws:

  • All impacted funds will be required to register by August 7, 2020;
  • Any new funds launched from the effective date will require immediate registration.
  • The registration fee for the initial registration of affected funds during the transition period will be waived; and
  • The first audited accounts for registered funds will not be required to be filed with CIMA until six months following the first full financial year after registration.  Unlike other offshore jurisdictions that do not require local auditors, these audited financial statements must be submitted by a CIMA approved local auditor.

As always, for further instruction, please speak to your legal advisors.

By Elana Margulies-Snyderman


Latest News
10.1.2020

Cayman Islands Enacts Legislative Changes to Enhance the Oversight of Investment Funds

The Cayman Islands Government has drafted two bills to enhance regulation for all Cayman-domiciled hedge funds and also impact private equity funds for the first time, in an effort to boost best practices, strengthen investor confidence and ensure the Islands remains the preeminent jurisdiction for investment funds formation.

Mutual Funds (Amendment) Bill, 2020 and the Private Funds Bill, 2020 would require both hedge funds and private equity funds to have annual audits issued or undertaken by a Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA)-approved local auditor.

Under the new Mutual Funds Bill, funds with fewer than 15 investors would now be required to register with CIMA, comply with annual return requirements, retain accessible records and have annual audits done by a CIMA-approved local auditor.

According to the Private Funds Bill, all private funds would have to comply with above. In addition, they would have requirements for valuation, safekeeping, title verification and cash monitoring. The bill also allows private funds the flexibility to choose the service provider(s) who would provide any required valuation, safekeeping, title verification and cash monitoring services; provided that any administrator, custodian or other independent third party appointed is independent from the fund’s manager or operator or, where any of the manager or operator or their affiliates is appointed, they identify and disclose any conflicts of interest.

The Government is planning a series of briefings and releases in the coming months with the first briefing to be held January 10.

By Elana Margulies-Snyderman


Latest News
5.10.2018

Asset Management Update: FASB Modifies Fair Value Disclosure Requirements

ASU 2018-13 significantly reduces disclosure requirements related to level 3 investments held by private investment companies

Introduction

In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.i This update is part of the FASB’s larger disclosure framework project intended to improve the effectiveness of financial statement footnote disclosure.  ASU 2018-13 modifies required fair value disclosures related primarily to level 3 investments.  The ASU impacts non-publicii and public entities differently; a summary of changes to disclosure requirements categorized by nonpublic and public entities is presented below.

Nonpublic Entities (including private investment companies such as hedge and private equity funds):

Disclosure Removals

  • Valuation process for level 3 measurements.Insight: Specifically, the ASU deletesiii ASC  820-10-55-105, which required a description of the group responsible for valuation policies and procedures, its methods of calibration and back testing, its process for analyzing changes in fair value measurements, its process for analyzing third-party information used in valuation, and its methods used to develop and substantiate unobservable inputs.

     

  • Policy regarding the timing of transfers between levels in the fair value hierarchy.Insight: ASU 2018-13 eliminates the requirement to disclose this policy, however, entities will still be required to set and consistently follow a policy on transfer timing (typically (a) the date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer, (b) the beginning of the reporting period or (c) the end of the reporting period).

     

  • Changes in unrealized gains and losses for Level 3 fair value measurements still held at the end of the period.Insight: Previously, this disclosure was often presented as a supplement to the “level 3 roll-forward” table.

Disclosure Modifications

  • In lieu of a reconciliation of opening and closing balances “roll-forward” of level 3 fair value measurements, disclosure is required of transfers into and out of level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and purchases and issues of Level 3 assets and liabilities.Insight: Each of the elements noted above, purchases, issues, transfers in, and transfers out must be disclosed separately under the ASU.  Similar to existing GAAPiv , the reasons for transfers into or out of level 3 must also be disclosed.

     

  • For investments valued using the practical expedient (unadjusted net asset value), the requirements to disclose (1) an estimate of the timing of liquidity events of the investee and (2) the timing on when limitations on redemptions related to the investee may lapse only apply if the investee has already disclosed this information publicly or directly to the reporting entity.Insight: This modification eliminates the need for entities to make its own estimate on timing of such events. Disclosure is now required only if it is known.
  • Deletion of the words “at a minimum” from the phrase “an entity shall disclose at a minimum” throughout the guidance to promote the appropriate exercise of discretion by entities when considering fair value measurement disclosures and to clarify that materiality is an appropriate consideration of entities and their auditors when evaluating disclosure requirements.Insight: Disclosure of weighted average and range of unobservable (level 3) inputs for nonpublic entities

    Prior to ASU 2018-13, all entities were required to provide quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs for level 3 fair value measurements.  This has not changed under the ASU.  General practice for investment companies has developed such that the range and weighted average of unobservable inputs are generally disclosed to comply with this requirement.  As discussed below, the ASU added an explicit requirement for public entities to disclose range and weighted average of unobservable inputs.  Non-public entities are exempt from this specific requirement, however, the requirement to provide quantitative information about unobservable inputs remains.  Entity management must use judgement in determining the most appropriate quantitative information about unobservable inputs to disclose going forward.

Public Entities (Including 1940 Act mutual funds, BDCs and broker-dealers)

Disclosure Additions

  • Explicit requirement to disclose the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop level 3 fair value measurements and how the weighted average was calculated.  Other quantitative information (such as the median or arithmetic average) may be disclosed in lieu of the weighted average if it is determined to be a more reasonable and rational method to reflect the distribution of unobservable inputs used to develop level 3 fair value measurements.
  • Changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting periodInsight: Investment companies will not be significantly impacted by this requirement as under ASC 946, they recognize unrealized gains and losses related to investments on the income statement, not a statement of other comprehensive income.

Disclosure Removals

  • Details on transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.Insight: Note that nonpublic entities are exempt from this requirement under current GAAP and ASU 2018-13.
  • Policy regarding the timing of transfers between levels in the fair value hierarchy.
  • Valuation process for Level 3 measurements.

Disclosure Modifications

  • For investments valued using the practical expedient (net asset value), the requirements to disclose (1) an estimate of the timing of liquidity events of the investee and (2) the timing on when limitations on redemptions related to the investee may lapse only apply if the investee has already disclosed this information publicly or directly to the reporting entity.
  • Deletion of the words “at a minimum” from the phrase “an entity shall disclose at a minimum” throughout the guidance to promote the appropriate exercise of discretion by entities when considering fair value measurement disclosures and to clarify that materiality is an appropriate consideration of entities and their auditors when evaluating disclosure requirements.
  • Clarification that the measurement uncertainty disclosure is to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date rather than sensitivity to future changes in fair value.Insight: Note that nonpublic entities are exempt from this requirement under current GAAP and ASU 2018-13.


Effective Date and Transition

ASU 2018-13 is effective for all entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those annual periods.  Early adoption is permitted.  Entities are permitted to early adopt any removed or modified disclosures and delay adoption of additional disclosures until their effective date.

The prospective method of adoption is required for additional or modified disclosures related to (1) changes in unrealized gains or losses included in OCI, (2) range and weighted average for significant inputs to level 3 investments and (3) uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date.  All other disclosure changes resulting from the ASU should be applied retrospectively.


i   Hereafter referred to as the “ASU” or “ASU 2018-13”
ii  A “Nonpublic entity” is an entity that does not meet any of the following conditions:

  1. Its debt or equity securities trade in a public market either on a stock exchange (domestic or foreign) or in an over-the-counter market, including securities quoted only locally or regionally.
  2. It is a conduit bond obligor for conduit debt securities that are traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign stock exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local or regional markets).
  3. It files with a regulatory agency in preparation for the sale of any class of debt or equity securities in a public market.
  4. It is required to file or furnish financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  5. It is controlled by an entity covered by criteria (a) through (d)

iii  Accounting Standards Codification
iv  Generally Accepted Accounting Principles


Publications
25.9.2018

EisnerAmper LLP Opens London Office

Robert Mirsky Named Head of the London Office and Head of the Asset Management Group

EisnerAmper LLP—a leading provider of accounting, tax and consulting services to global financial firms—announced that it is opening an office in London, one of the world’s leading asset management centers.

Robert Mirsky is joining EisnerAmper as the Head of the London office and Head of the Asset Management Group. “As Brexit unfolds, Europe is facing an unprecedented period of economic and regulatory challenges and opportunities,” says Charles Weinstein, Chief Executive Officer of EisnerAmper LLP. “Adding Robert to our team will greatly enhance our ability to offer clients highly specialized, expert financial advisory services in this growing yet rapidly changing market.”

Mirsky has more than 20 years of experience advising investment fund managers, financial services companies, banks and investors in the structuring and operational aspects of alternative investments. He has worked in Big Four firms throughout the world, including in the U.S., the U.K., Italy, Thailand and the Cayman Islands and, most recently, he led a global hedge fund practice. In addition, he has significant experience in cross-border structuring, operations, regulation, taxation and international M&A.

Mirsky is a frequent speaker at asset management industry events and is often called upon by both the U.S. and international press to provide insights on industry issues. He has also written extensively on both hedge fund technical issues and asset management industry trends. Mirsky is the Founder and Chairman Emeritus of the child protection charity Help for Children U.K. and has testified before the U.K. Parliament on strategies for encouraging charitable giving across the financial services sector.

“I’m excited to be working with the EisnerAmper Financial Services team as we continue to evolve and develop as one of the leading asset management service providers in the world,” says Mirsky.

“We look forward to Rob joining our practice group and adding his capabilities to our client service offering,” said Peter Cogan, Co-Chair of EisnerAmper’s Financial Services Group. “Our continuing investments in resources and talent in the U.S. and abroad further enhance our position as a world-class alternative investment and financial services accounting and advisory firm.”


Latest News
11.1.2018

EisnerAmper Global welcomes Singapore member

EisnerAmper Cayman is delighted to welcome EisnerAmper Singapore to the EisnerAmper Global network. EisnerAmper Global is a specialist network of independent member firms operating in key financial services and international trading hubs. EisnerAmper Global member firms provide clients with access to the expertise of 200 partners and 2,000 professionals globally, with office locations including New York, Miami, San Francisco, Cayman, Dublin and Singapore.

EisnerAmper Singapore, formerly Saw Meng Tee & Partners PAC, provides specialist accounting, advisory, outsourcing,and risk & regulatory services to international and domestic clients operating in Singapore and across Asia. At EisnerAmper Singapore’s launch, Managing Partner Saw Meng Tee noted that EisnerAmper Singapore’s vision is to be “recognised as one of Singapore’s leading professional services firms in the specialist areas of financial services, corporate solutions and advisory”. EisnerAmper Ireland and Saw Meng Tee & Partners PAC have been working closely together over the past 18 months to further develop existing ties between Ireland and Singapore.

For enquiries, please contact Saw Meng Tee, Managing Partner, EisnerAmper Singapore or visit the EisnerAmper Singapore website.


Latest News
10.1.2018

Business in Brief: EisnerAmper Celebrates 10 Years in Cayman

Accounting, auditing and advisory firm EisnerAmper Cayman celebrated its 10th anniversary in the Cayman Islands at The Westin Grand Cayman last week.

EisnerAmper flew in Adam Cheyer, a co-founder of Siri, the digital assistant in Apple’s iPhone, as a key note speaker.

Mr. Cheyer, who also co-founded Viv, the digital assistant which Samsung branded as Bixby for the Galaxy S8, gave two presentations to local high school students and the business community, last Thursday.

Ben Leung, EisnerAmper’s managing partner, said: “We wanted the pupils at all the local schools to have the opportunity to listen to and meet someone who is a high achiever in the technology field. Moreover the area of mobile technology in particular is relevant now and will become more so in the future.”

The evening session was devoted to the future of artificial intelligence. Given that automation has famously reduced the number of blue collar jobs and is anticipated to reduce the number of white collar jobs as well, the presentation addressed how artificial intelligence is likely to affect businesses going forward.

Mr. Cheyer outlined the future of digital assistants which, although ubiquitous on all computer and smartphone operating systems, are not that widely used.

Mr. Cheyer said it will need four things to elevate assistants from a utility “that is nice to have to a paradigm” that every business will need to use.

This would require one assistant that can be accessed from any device for any type of service in a way that can be personalized, he said.

EisnerAmper Cayman started in 2007 as one of the smallest firms in Cayman and has quickly grown its staff and offices, now located at Cricket Square. “The world financial crisis commenced shortly after we launched so arguably it was not the best timing,” Mr. Leung said. “However, there is always a demand for quality, and we positioned ourselves in the market as a firm where senior management were heavily involved in engagements.”

The firm has undertaken many pro-bono audits such as the CI Red Cross, NCVO, CI Chamber of Commerce and Cayman Finance.

James Lewis, partner, said: “We also try and take every opportunity to participate in events supporting charities. Every year we are out at the supermarkets for Veterans Day. We have dress-down days for local charities like Rock Your Socks (Downs Syndrome) and participate in the events such as the 5Ks for the CI Red Cross and Cayman Crisis Centre, also a sponsor for both.”

A copy of the article published on the Cayman Compass can be downloaded from the following link: Business in brief – EisnerAmper celebrates 10 years in Cayman – Cayman Compass

Other articles written during Adam Cheyer’s visit are on the following link:

SIRI co-founder: AI still too narrow to be feared – The Journal

Siri founder shares secrets to success – Cayman Compass


Events
17.11.2017

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-09, Disclosures about Short Duration Contracts

 ASU No. 2015-09 focuses on improving existing disclosure requirements to all insurance entities that issue short-duration contracts.  The main improvements provide increased transparency of significant estimates in measuring the liabilities for unpaid claims and claims expenses and provides additional information to analyse the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows from insurance contracts and development of claims estimates. An in-depth discussion of these improvements can be found at our website: ASU 2015-09

Amendments

 Required disclosures (RD) to be included in the notes to the financial statements:

  1. Incurred and paid claims development tables by accident year for the most recent reporting period.
  2. A reconciliation of incurred and paid claims development information to the aggregate carrying amount of the liability with separate disclosure of reinsurance recoverable.
  3. For each accident year presented, total of incurred but not reported (IBNR) liabilities plus expected development on reported claims accompanied by description of reserving methodologies (and any changes thereto).
  4. For each accident year presented, quantitative information about claim frequency accompanied by a qualitative description of methodologies used for determining claim frequency information (and any changes thereto).

Required supplementary information (RSI) disclosure to be included either in the notes to the financial statements or as a separate schedule:

  1. Incurred and paid claims development tables by accident year for all years except for the most recent reporting period.
  2. For all claims except health insurance claims, the average annual percentage payout of incurred claims by age.

RD’s plus RSI’s and their audit considerations:

Required disclosures

In forming an opinion, amongst other considerations the auditing standards require the auditor to consider the compliance of the financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (US GAAP). If financial statements do not fully comply with US GAAP (including, but not limited to, omissions or errors) the auditor will need to assess the significance of the matter in forming an opinion. Depending on the significance of the matter the auditor may consider modifying the opinion. The auditor will need to assess each scenario individually based on facts and circumstances.

Required supplementary information

The RSI is not part of the basic financial statements, however, the information is considered to be an essential part of financial reporting by the relevant standard setters. In general, standard setters do not expect the auditor’s opinion on the fair presentation of such financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework to be affected by the presentation by the entity of the RSI or the failure to present some or all of such RSI.

The audit standards require that the auditor perform some limited procedures on RSI which includes but is not limited to:

  • Inquire of management;
  • Compare the information for consistency with (i) management’s responses to the foregoing inquiries, (ii) the basic financial statements, and (iii) other knowledge obtained during the audit of the basic financial statements; and,
  • Obtain certain written representations from management.

Audit report considerations:

  • If all or some of the RSI is presented, the audit report will include additional communications in an “Other Matter” paragraph that is not considered a modification to the audit opinion as follows:
    • A statement that the RSI is required under US GAAP to supplement the basic financial statements.
    • A statement that the RSI, although not part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), who considers it an essential part of financial reporting.
    • If we are able to complete the procedures required by auditing standards:
      • A statement that we have applied certain limited procedures to the RSI, including a summary of the basic procedures;
      • A statement that we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI.
    • If we are unable to complete the procedures required by auditing standards:
      • A statement that we are unable to apply certain limited procedures to the RSI and the reason;
      • A statement that we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI.
    • If some of the RSI is omitted, we will include in the “Other Matter” paragraph the following:
      • A statement that management has omitted the missing RSI required by US GAAP;
      • A statement that such missing RSI, although not part of the basic financial statements, is required by FASB, who considers it an essential part of financial reporting;
      • A statement that our opinion on the basic financial statements is not affected by the missing RSI.
    • If the measurement or presentation of the RSI departs materially from US GAAP, a statement that although the auditor’s opinion on the basic financial statements is not affected, material departures from prescribed guidelines exist, including a description of the departure.
    • If the auditor has unresolved doubts about whether the RSI is measured or presented in accordance with prescribed guidelines, a statement that although our opinion on the basic financial statements is not affected, the results of the limited procedures have raised doubts about whether material modifications should be made to the RSI for it to be presented in accordance with guidelines.
  • If all of the RSI is omitted, the “Other Matter” paragraph should include (e) above.

The auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, AU-C Section 730: Required Supplementary Information, contains illustrative examples of Other Matters paragraphs addressing the scenarios discussed above.

AU-C Section 730 par. A3: Illustration 1- The Required Supplementary Information Is Included, the Auditor Has Applied the Specified Procedures, and No Material Departures Have Been Identified

US GAAP requires that the required supplementary information on page XX be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by FASB who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.

 AU-C Section 730 par. A3: Illustration 2 – All Required Supplementary Information Omitted

Management has omitted the required supplementary information that US GAAP requires to be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such missing information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by FASB who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. Our opinion on the basic financial statements is not affected by this missing information.

 AU-C Section 730 par. A3: Illustration 3 – Some Required Supplementary Information Is Omitted and Some Is Presented in Accordance With the Prescribed Guidelines

US GAAP requires that the included supplementary information be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by FASB who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with evidence sufficient to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Management has omitted [the missing required supplementary information] that US GAAP requires to be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such missing information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by FASB who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. Our opinion on the basic financial statements is not affected by this missing information.


Publications
15.3.2017

EisnerAmper LLP is awarded Best Global Accounting Firm

EisnerAmper LLP was named Best Global Accounting Firm in the 2017 Global Service Provider Awards Survey conducted for Hedgeweek Global.  The Global Service Provider Awards are amongst the hedge fund industry’s most prestigious and competitive awards and are based on a rigorous peer review survey of Hedgeweek’s readers, which includes a global audience of investors, fund managers and industry service providers.

Charles Weinstein, EisnerAmper LLP’s Chief Executive Officer, said that EisnerAmper LLP was honoured to be receiving the award and to being recognised as the preeminent accounting and advisory firm in the alternative investment marketplace.

 


Latest News
20.6.2016

EisnerAmper LLP & EisnerAmper Cayman attend GAIM Ops Cayman conference

Nicholas Tsafos and Peter Cogan, Audit Partners in EisnerAmper LLP and Directors of EisnerAmper Global, attended the Global Alternative Investment Management (“GAIM”) Ops Cayman conference on March 6-9 alongside Ben Leung, Managing Partner of EisnerAmper Cayman and Director of EisnerAmper Global.

GAIM was founded in 1994 and soon became the world’s largest international alternative investment event, known for its high intellectual content as well as the range, quality and quantity of the global investors and allocators it attracts. It has been held in Geneva, Monaco, Cannes, and Cayman.

GAIM is the annual global focal point for global investors to learn about the wider industry and the strategic debate within which alternatives operate, and secondly as an objective platform for the most interesting investment themes and best performing funds globally.

Peter, Nick and Ben were joined by other members of the EisnerAmper Cayman team to participate in interactive workshops and discussions.

eac-8

1 3

 

 


Events